The May Statement Said “8am” Instead of LawPay. Aisha’s Effective Rate Said 3.07%.
The May Statement Said “8am” Instead of LawPay. Aisha’s Effective Rate Said 3.07%.
Aisha Bennett opened her firm’s May 2026 processing statement at her desk in the Strip District on a Tuesday morning. The first thing she noticed was the cover. It did not say LawPay anymore. It said 8am. The second thing she noticed was the effective rate at the bottom of the summary page: 3.07%. The third thing — once she pulled the prior years for comparison — was that this LawPay rate increase had been compounding silently for 18 months.
When Bennett Hollins LLP — three attorneys, $45,000 a month in card volume, mostly retainer payments from estate planning and small-business clients — first signed up with LawPay in 2019, her effective rate was 2.4%. Seven years and three private equity owners later, she was paying 67 basis points more on every retainer dollar she ran through the firm. On $540,000 in annual card volume, that worked out to roughly $3,600 a year she had not been paying when Obama was still on the bench at the Supreme Court.
This is the post for every solo and small-firm partner who just opened a statement that did not match the brand they signed up with — and who is starting to suspect that the LawPay rate increase they have been quietly absorbing is not a coincidence.
The Corporate Timeline Most Lawyers Did Not Get a Letter About
LawPay was never an independent company in the way most attorneys assume. It is a brand operated by AffiniPay, a payments holding company founded in Austin in 2005 — and AffiniPay has been owned by private equity firms continuously since 2015.
2015: Great Hill Partners acquires AffiniPay. 2020: TA Associates buys AffiniPay from Great Hill. 2022: AffiniPay buys MyCase from Apax Partners; Apax takes a minority stake. July 2024: Genstar Capital makes a “significant investment” — reportedly valuing the company at almost $3 billion including debt. Apax fully exits. TA Associates retains a stake alongside Genstar. 2025: AffiniPay rebrands to “8am.” LawPay continues as a 8am product brand.
Most law firms did not receive a letter explaining any of this. The 2024 Genstar deal was reported in Fortune and The Deal but not communicated firm-by-firm. The 8am rebrand showed up on statements and login screens but not — for most subscribers — in a clear “we are now part of 8am” notification. This is not unusual. It is how the payments industry handles ownership changes when the changes do not require regulatory notice.
Aisha had been with LawPay for six years before the May 2026 statement made the rebrand visible to her. She is not unusual either. The payment processor rebrand pattern consistently leaves merchants discovering changes through their statements, not through the kind of formal notification a regulated industry would expect.
How a 67-Basis-Point LawPay Rate Increase Actually Compounds
The headline LawPay rate increase pattern is not a single rate hike. It is a slow, multi-year drift in the published rate plus a parallel drift in the per-card and pass-through fees that ride alongside it. Both drifts are documented in independent reviews of LawPay’s pricing across 2021–2026.
2021: 1.95% + $0.20 per transaction. 2026: 2.99% + $0.30 per transaction. That is a 104-basis-point jump on percentage and a 50% jump on per-transaction fee, on the cards that account for roughly 80% of typical law firm card volume.
2021: 2.95% + $0.20. 2026: 3.90% + $0.30. The Amex differential matters more for firms whose corporate-client mix runs higher — a 30%-Amex firm pays roughly 28 additional basis points blended versus a Visa-heavy firm at the same volume.
LawPay’s eCheck/ACH fee was historically capped at $10 per transaction. The cap has been removed. A $10,000 eCheck retainer that used to cost $10 to accept now costs $100 — a 10x increase on the largest single payments small firms typically run. For estate planning and commercial real estate practices, this is the single biggest dollar impact in the new fee schedule.
$19/month platform fee. $4.99/month “pass-through allocation fee.” Foreign card surcharge of approximately 1.75% on top of the headline rate. Each line is small. Together they add roughly 8 basis points to a typical law firm’s effective rate before any transaction even processes.
For Aisha’s $540,000 annual card volume, the difference between 2019 LawPay and 2026 8am LawPay was not a flag-waving rate hike. It was about $3,600 in additional annual processing cost — distributed across twelve monthly statements such that no single statement looked alarming on its own. Each month the fee schedule was 30 cents per transaction higher, or one foreign card slipped through at the new surcharge, or an estate-planning client paid a $9,800 retainer by eCheck for $98 instead of $10. The compounding only became visible when she pulled the year-over-year totals.
The IOLTA and MyCase Lock-In That Keeps Law Firms Stuck With a LawPay Rate Increase
Most law firms do not stay with LawPay because they love the rates. They stay because leaving is procedurally complicated in ways that do not apply to other industries.
Interest on Lawyers’ Trust Account rules vary by state but the universal requirement maintained by the American Bar Association is that processing fees on trust-account deposits must come from the firm’s operating account, not the trust account itself. The lock-in is not that LawPay is the only IOLTA-compliant option — it is that switching processors requires confirming with your state bar that the new processor’s fee allocation is also compliant. That confirmation step is friction.
MyCase, AffiniPay’s practice management software, was acquired in 2022 specifically to deepen this. If your firm runs case management, billing, and trust accounting through MyCase — or through CASEpeer or Docketwise, both also AffiniPay-owned — switching the payment processor means switching both at the same time. Switching both at once during a busy quarter is the actual reason most managing partners do not pull the trigger.
This is the part that turns a LawPay rate increase from a math problem into a Human Nature problem. Aisha could see the 67 basis points. The reason her draft email to her bookkeeper sat in her drafts folder for four months was that the practical answer to “why don’t we just switch?” was “because we’d also have to switch MyCase, and last quarter we billed 340 hours through it.” The PE-owned processor strategy is structured around exactly this calculation.
The Three Things That Got Bennett Hollins Off the Quiet LawPay Rate Increase Treadmill
Aisha did not switch processors immediately. She did three smaller things first, in order, and they made the eventual switch easier when she did make it.
Effective rate is total fees divided by total card volume. The published rate is what the marketing page shows. Those are not the same number after platform fees, pass-through allocation, foreign card surcharges, and the eCheck cap removal compound. Aisha’s published rate looked like 2.99%. Her actual effective rate was 3.07% — three years earlier it had been 2.4%.
Interchange-plus pricing bills the network’s published interchange cost plus a transparent processor markup. On her volume mix, the comparison quote came in at roughly 2.45% effective — about 62 basis points below 8am LawPay. Annual savings: ~$3,350.
Pennsylvania’s Office of Disciplinary Counsel maintains guidance on trust account processing. Aisha emailed them with the new processor’s fee allocation language and got back a confirmation that the structure complied with Rule 1.15. That email is now in her firm’s compliance folder.
What Aisha did not do was switch MyCase at the same time. Practice management migrations are their own multi-month project, and bundling them with a payment processor switch is how good intentions become abandoned drafts. She kept MyCase, switched the processor, and put the practice management evaluation on the next-quarter list.
This Is Not Just a LawPay Rate Increase. It Is the PE-Owned Processor Pattern.
The LawPay rate increase Aisha experienced is not a LawPay-specific story. It is the standard operating pattern at every payment processor that has been through a private equity acquisition cycle — Heartland after Global Payments bought it, Vantiv after FIS bought Worldpay, North American Bancard before and after the rebrand to “North.” The mechanics differ slightly. The outcome for the merchant is consistent.
- Acquisition closes quietly. Most merchants learn through the brand on their statements, not through a notification.
- Customer-facing tools stay the same. The portal looks the same. The login works. Customer service phone numbers route to the same agents for several quarters.
- Rate sheets update at renewal cycles, not at the acquisition. The new ownership rarely raises rates immediately. Rate updates happen 12–18 months in, embedded in standard contract renewals or “schedule updates” that look procedural.
- Pass-through and platform fees creep. The headline percentage may move only slightly. The platform fees, monthly minimums, foreign card surcharges, and pass-through line items move more.
- Integrated software products become switching costs. The processor’s parent company acquires the practice management software, the invoicing tool, the trust accounting product. Switching processors now means switching software too.
The structural critique of how private equity ownership reshapes payment processors is the broader version of this story. Aisha’s LawPay rate increase is one specific case. Bennett Hollins is one specific firm. The pattern is industry-wide, well-documented, and visible in every PE-acquired processor’s fee schedule trajectory.
What to Ask Before You Stay With or Leave a PE-Owned Processor
Most managing partners reading this will not switch processors this week. That is fine. The point of the post is not to switch — it is to know what you are paying, who actually owns the company collecting it, and what the procedural exit looks like if and when you decide a quiet LawPay rate increase no longer works for the firm.
Pull twelve months of statements. Sum every fee line. Divide by total card volume. That number is your effective rate. The published rate from the welcome email is almost never the real number after a year of platform fees, surcharges, and pass-through allocations.
For LawPay, the answer is 8am, owned by Genstar Capital and TA Associates. For most processors the answer involves at least one private equity firm, and often a chain of them. Knowing the answer is not the same as needing to leave — but it is the answer that explains why your statements are getting more complicated, not simpler.
Most state bars do not require LawPay specifically. They require that processing fees on trust-account deposits come from the operating account, not the trust account, and that the processor handles fee allocation accordingly. Most modern processors comply. Get that in writing from your state bar’s ethics counsel before you initiate any switch — it removes the single most common reason firms decide to stay put.
If you run MyCase, CASEpeer, or Docketwise — all AffiniPay/8am properties — switching only the processor is harder, but it is possible. The deeper question is whether you want to be on a practice management platform owned by the same PE-backed company that runs your payments. The answer can reasonably be yes for a few quarters while you plan a separate evaluation. It should not be yes by default forever.
Frequently Asked Questions
8am is the rebranded name for AffiniPay, the holding company that has owned LawPay since 2005. LawPay continues as a product brand under 8am. CPACharge, MyCase, CASEpeer, and Docketwise are also 8am properties. The rebrand happened in 2025; the underlying ownership chain (Great Hill 2015, TA Associates 2020, Genstar 2024) predates it.
Both are possible, but the LawPay rate increase pattern is well-documented. Independent reviews show the headline Visa/MC/Discover rate moving from 1.95% + $0.20 in 2021 to 2.99% + $0.30 in 2026. The eCheck cap removal is a separate, more recent change with disproportionate impact on firms running large retainers via ACH. Pull 12 months of statements and compute the effective rate yourself.
LawPay’s published merchant agreement does not include an early termination fee. The cost of leaving lives in the procedural switching steps — confirming IOLTA compliance with the state bar, notifying clients with stored payment methods, decoupling from MyCase if the firm uses it — not in a contract penalty. Confirm the current contract language with your account representative in writing before you initiate a switch.
Sometimes. Firms over roughly $30,000/month in card volume have reported successfully negotiating reductions on the platform fee or foreign card surcharge by presenting a competing interchange-plus quote. The leverage on a LawPay rate increase is “I have a written quote at X effective rate.” Without the quote, the leverage is rhetorical.
Stored card data does not transfer between processors. Clients on auto-pay or recurring payment plans need to be re-enrolled with the new processor, which typically means notifying them and asking them to authorize the new processor. The notification window is the part most firms underestimate — plan for 30–60 days of overlap during which both processors are active to catch the recurring billings as they roll over. There is a procedural sequence that minimizes the gap.
More on PE-Owned Processors and Law Firm Payment Costs
Open your last 12 months of LawPay statements. Send them in. We’ll show you the effective rate.
If you’re a managing partner who suspects the LawPay rate increase has been compounding longer than you noticed — like Aisha did — the answer is in your own statements. Send us the last 12 months and we’ll compute the effective rate, identify the line items that have moved, and show you what an interchange-plus quote on your actual volume would look like. No commitment, no pressure.
Get Your Free Statement ReviewNo obligation • No pressure • Response within one business day